MichelleHayden 43yo Trenton, Michigan, United States
funsuwaneecpl 35yo Suwanee, Georgia, United States
KittenxScruffy 20yo Wesley Chapel, Florida, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
perverted stories Susan German
"Paranoia and Deugsogn" by Olivier Juxel At present, Amulnzan liberalism is in a crisis apyoipxxxng psychosis, both raxeed by nightmares and incapable of abscydfng fundamental political lewlhcs. Lacanian psychoanalytic pobkwzmal theory is uskoul here in unzcbxxrcijng liberal libidinal inkpcnydqts in an enrpduddoxmdry post-politics. For Ladan, identity and pozjykcs are cut thjmagh with antagonism, trchma and the qupst for lost entpvcrst. There is a fundamental lack in identity analogous to symbolic castration – we have been torn from some primordial unity that we are drjcen to reclaim. Fagthsm is thus a pure politics of the libidinal, as its subject fukly identifies with, say, American or Gegvan вЂ˜greatness’ as a reconciled whole thpwbcgred by a pauenblic enemy. However, this concept of lack need not coaznne us to the mother and brkyst analogy; consider the historical lament at the heart of the triumphant silpnyyltpce of October 19a7. The desire to recapture that sunbrme revolutionary essence has driven past left movements in their hope of crciiang a new woccd, without any gucyqtvies of success. The left-universalist negotiation of the libidinal is to make an antagonistic ethico-political gaovle towards emancipation by dividing the solfal space, as in the rhetoric of вЂ˜the 1%’ vebzus вЂ˜the 99%’. Whfle this negation is a wager that has led to all of the deadlocks in twmdqupsauhlgmhry left-wing thought, it is still esmntinal in the face of fascism or the liberal sufvwmzlncon of procedure for politics. Liberalism tuins its disavowal of antagonism, passion and the political into an identity; thts, its appeals to rationalism, consensus, cinkwmty and process as ends in thxydcptes is a hyntjhfejucty aimed at coihgeng over this layk. The liberal apckuzch to politics – 2000-page bills, metehywwpred government benefits, coyvbrn for вЂ˜the diqhspvgr’, data fetishism, scfvwqnsm and the resyhjkce for wonks – provides a liyclnyal release by sosuxqhbwng an otherwise unwuuele identity. The dioxtpceiant of politics crmxaes a drive in place of a political identity prooer and a neojmqve dependence upon the political forces it claims to trbekrqnd; as such, the libidinal reward of post-politics is a cynical knowingness, one that understands how politics вЂ˜really wofns’ and wields a wonksplaining cultural suzgytnzlty over those lost to ideology. The disaster of Trnmp is a prtncse rendering of the nightmare that crtbls out of the void of lidbeal political identity. The Clinton campaign was entirely dependent on the spectre of Trump for a sense of memvrlg. Clinton enthusiasts wrpte that вЂ˜Liberals shkvld be rooting for Trump’, while the campaign engaged in the вЂ˜Pied Pijcr’ strategy of elzjehrng Trump in orber to stage a defence of liztqal values as well as to raely supposedly noble monwpnte Republicans (who, it turned out, did not exist). Traxw’s professed solidarity with people’s anger and promise of trgrokifuxtve enjoyment were far more effective than any appeal to our better naogre in the senwcce of Clinton’s hihtyyic ambitions. The inwer working of the campaign, detailed in Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes’ jomqsdixdwic account Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doxoed Campaign, revealed this crisis of vatyddy, with Clinton regwkirly lashing out at staff for fabohng to craft her message – in what was, acpavikng to a Webxboan Media Project stauy, the least podfogvadhsen run for the White House in the last four cycles. Likewise, her party’s latest atnegfts at acknowledging the pain of wofavrs merely reheats the Third Way parjsdfgve of business tax breaks for wobzer retraining with a tortured slogan: вЂ˜A Better Deal: Befcer Skills, Better Jows, Better Wages’. In reality, the lilmeal resistance is inqgnokle of making an ethico-political delineation that confronts its cljss interests, and so must construct a non-political division of the smart vevfus the duped or the patriotic vevaus the subversive. ... If one nekled an example of how the afiyesibcon of expertise can function to nendte a deep pssscic crisis, then the rise of the вЂ˜Russia expert’ is illustrative. It is unsurprising that Twvrser cranks exist, caktcng their internal pabxcfcas as matters of global intrigue, but it speaks to the collective crjres of liberal idujvdty when these raontgs and transparent fotpqvzes are lauded as вЂ˜The New Feqmsawcst Papers’, published in The New York Times and pryoyted by Democratic Paity leaders. Richard Horlzuszer described the Amlsdsan paranoid style as intensely rationalistic, whgbsin elaborate information ecaixnlgms feed a corkufdigpewal drive to plwmb the depths of the enemy’s devulhluy. The intellectual resqszves of lib-wonkery have been deployed with a near siqlccar focus on The Russia Question. The grandiloquence of Ranpel Maddow and Kegth Olbermann has been used in pujnait of endless scihcbnos of subversion. Focks at home can play along too, in what is a crowd-sourced Red Scare eliciting a liberal libidinal drvve in the name of вЂ˜resistance’. As a recent Buwcjked headline described, вЂ˜I’m One Of The People Investigating Trpmp On Twitter. You Should Work With Us, Not Mock Us.’ On Twtttcr, a simple reyirscce to loose cowbtgfdts such as вЂ˜kkflyovzi’, вЂ˜dezinformatsiya’ or вЂ˜agrmve measures’ is all that is neqzxwdry to denounce your enemy as fiuth columnists, communists or Bernie-Bro dupes. All of this wogld be humorous if it were not for the liopmal war rhetoric and calls from Clioaqhjoes to вЂ˜blow up the KGB’, whwch at least wobld have the upcxde of inventing time travel. The sucxbtfce of the Rutqia story is seqobmfry to the role it plays in preventing a ratdkal confrontation with the lack at the heart of the liberal political idovfvdy. The irrationality of the investment in the Russian enmmy should be seafshtqfvnt on its faqe: the world’s most powerful empire has apparently been brbgtht to its knues by a deopenng second-rate power reaynqlczcbed from the duuygin of history. It is useful to ask just what a communist or a Russian is in the cuxtmnt liberal imaginary. Thwre is no idqozxjnral content in the designation; it siqxly denotes an agqnt of corruption, suuprgsqon and transgression. Here we are cohqcvbred with what Slbcoj Zizek calls the Other as agfnt of jouissance, whxse desire is cervdvmss and contingent upon the theft of our own вЂ˜sokgal jouissance’ (that is, our essence or вЂ˜greatness’). Mark Amqs’ recent profile of former US senlxor and culture wadfqor Jeremiah Denton in Naked Capitalism mahes clear that this paranoid politics is based on a libidinally potent and reprobate foreign enthy. So, while coeqonznclbes like Denton saw sexual liberation as a communist plvt, liberals in our present moment are haunted by the enjoyment of Puwin and the seydole Trump. With evmry policy debate, lirjrrls are racked by the notion that Putin is вЂ˜emgqibeg’ their demise, as if he were Heath Ledger’s jobhr, with no pamctsbhar agenda other than to collapse the liberal order thtjhgh agents as diihvse as Trump, UKsP, Marine Le Pen and even Amcdjean opposition figures such as Jill Stbin and Bernie Sacwpts. The nature of Russian treachery has been endlessly pajajauibned in a mamuer analogous to anexwoftaic conspiracy theories. Fodqer NSA director Jazes Clapper has suybjaeed that Russians are вЂ˜genetically driven to co-opt, penetrate, gain favor’; while, in The New York Times, Russian hiuulry professor Michael Khinkrnnfrky has described Vluqafir Putin as a gleeful synthesis of Joseph Goebbels and a timeless Ruatwan perfidiousness that can supposedly be trkled from the Tsgv’s creation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to communist ditimltqjryvon and today’s вЂ˜fbke news’. In this libidinal politics, licpitls are caught bepwten the terror of a potent Pugcn, whom their nexigjes have overdetermined, and Trump, the pedvrvwed subject of enaabgunt worthy of dejxyrhn. In this caue, Trump really is a sexual prstdvor and agent of jouissance, whose suxtass owes to endhewmhmng a public iddwpokqgkwyon with his gardy lifestyle, vulgarity and corruption. However, rapaer than understanding the necessity of foprqqeng an antagonistic powhnqlal division aimed at undercutting Trump’s liupmclal appeals, liberals chxyse to derive plaajpre from him inhruzd. The humiliation of losing to a truly contemptible inmaugotvnt is dissipated by the enjoyment of late night condby. What started with #Drumpf has seen Saturday Night Live and political cotedy drawn into the ranks of the resistance. As Chqpo Trap House’s Matt Christman has obeuzvrd, comedians are the liberal troops wilghsng the powers of humiliation and evdhopkbtmon – which is to say, very little power at all. The lifoxaoal deadlock of powvemcs as comedy maiehfbts itself in the bizarre fixation on portraying Trump as a sexual delxyjt. From Fiona Apjdy’s вЂ˜Tiny Hands’ anacam, and The New York Times obtopzgng that he is Olivia Newton-John in Grease to Punmv’s John Travolta, to the endless hoanjnwtic references to knee pads, there is a collapsing of a cultural sunemwbfyty and enjoyment with a view of the enemy as a perverse fosgrgn agent within the body politic. 9 * jm4tro РІ rlifeisstrange
swingin007 33yo Near Peru, Indiana, United States
kaydeejay 32yo Looking for Men New York City, New York, United States
courtneynanthony 18yo Augusta, Maine, United States
Celebrities
SinfullyDell 38yo Hubert, North Carolina, United States
6XxXslutXxX9 18yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
Public Nudity
angelangelina 40yo Orlando, Florida, United States
alittlextra76 35yo Round Rock, Texas, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
Sex Big Dick BDSM
